Abstract

Reviewed studies revealed limited researches on how sana all really works as a response in everyday social media interactions. In such light, this study was conceptualized to describe sana all as an expression across ages. This study employed basic descriptive qualitative design. Criterion sampling was used in choosing the participants. Aide-Mémoire was used as the main data gathering tool. Fifteen (15) Ilokano participants aged 13-60 years old from Santiago, Ilocos Sur took part in this study. A family member, friend or schoolmate for each of the main participants also participated as part of the triangulation process of the study. Then, the data were analyzed using the cool and warm analyses. It was found that the expression sana all is commonly used by participants to express desire or wish to experience the positive situations of others and influenced by their awareness and exposure to others’ lives, especially through online communication. Furthermore, it functions both as a way of conveying personal aspiration and as a source of inspiration, which can influence individuals in both positive and negative ways. Hence, future studies may look into the context of sana all in daily communication.

Full Article

DOI: 10.56901/TGHB7456

References

Aksoy, E. (2020). Uses and gratifications approach in social media research. Journal of Media Studies.

Allahverdi, F. Z. (2021). Uses and gratifications theory in digital communication. International Journal of Communication Research.

Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). Mediatization and sociolinguistic change. De Gruyter.

Appel, G., Grewal, L., Hadi, R., & Stephen, A. T. (2020). The future of social media in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 79–95.

Azarias, R. A. (2022a). English as medium of instruction: The case of technology-related classrooms. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education and Technology (ICETECH 2021), Advances in Social, Education and Humanities Research, 630, 301-312.

Azarias, R. A. (2022b). Milieu of English language use in industrial-technical classrooms: Implication for intervention and policy formulation. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 11(12), 103-124. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2022.332

Azarias, R.A., Garcia, A.F., & Garlejo, V.G. (2022). Heirloom Food Preservation Techniques and Languages of the Indigenous Peoples of Cervantes, Ilocos Sur, Philippines. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 4(1), 262-269. https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss.2022.4.1.26

Bautista, M. L. S. (2004). Tagalog-English code switching as a mode of discourse. Asia Pacific Education Review, 5(2), 226–233.

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (2020). The social construction of reality. Penguin. (Original work published 1966)

Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.

Carraturo, M., et al. (2023). Social comparison and emotional responses on social media. Journal of Social Media Psychology.

Castells, M. (2019). Networks of outrage and hope (2nd ed.). Polity Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design (4th ed.). Sage.

de Ven, N., Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2019). The psychology of envy: Benign and malicious envy. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 1–5.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer.

Dunlop, S. M., More, E., & Romer, D. (2020). Where do youth learn about social media? Journal of Adolescence, 79, 1–10.

Eccles, J. S., et al. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In Achievement and achievement motivation.

Enriquez, V. G. (1992). From colonial to liberation psychology. University of the Philippines Press.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. Longman.

Ferguson, C. J. (2021). Social media and mental health: A review. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 1–6.

Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.

Fishbach, A. (2020). Get it done: Surprising lessons from the science of motivation. Little, Brown Spark.

Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.

Gable, S. L., & Reis, H. T. (2020). Good news! Capitalizing on positive events. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 195–257.

Gao, Q. (2023). Emotional engagement in digital communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication.

Gerbner, G. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26(2), 172–199.

Gergen, K. J. (2021). Relational being. Oxford University Press.

Hatfield, E., et al. (1994). Emotional contagion. Cambridge University Press.

Hossain, M. A. (2019). Effects of social media on emotional and social needs. Journal of Social Media Studies.

Hunt, M. G., et al. (2019). No more FOMO: Limiting social media decreases loneliness and depression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 37(10), 751–768.

Javellana, S., & Eustaquio, M. (2024). Sana all: A critical discourse analysis on its popularity among Filipino Generation Z (Unpublished research paper).

Jocano, F. L. (1997). Filipino value system.Punlad Research House.

Kasser, T. (2022). Materialistic values and well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology.

Katz, E., et al. (1974). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523.

Kietzmann, J. H., et al. (2011). Social media?Get serious! Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251.

Kushlev, K., et al. (2022). Social media and well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45.

Leech, G. (2020). Principles of pragmatics. Routledge. (Original work published 1983)

Liu, D., et al. (2024). Benign envy and motivation in social media contexts. Computers in Human Behavior.

Luo, M. (2020). Emotional gratification in social media use. Telematics and Informatics.

Lyubomirsky, S. (2019). The how of happiness. Penguin Books.

Malinowski, B. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages.

Markham, A. N., & Buchanan, E. (2012). Ethical decision-making and internet research.

Markus, H., &Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969.

Meier, A., & Johnson, B. K. (2022). Social comparison and envy on social media. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45.

Milkman, K. L., et al. (2021). Motivational interventions and behavior change. Nature Human Behaviour.

Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability. Psychological Review, 91(3), 328–346.

Oettingen, G. (2019). The psychology of thinking about the future. Guilford Press.

Orb, A., et al. (2001). Ethics in qualitative research.

Panglao, J. (2024). From expression to connection: Decoding “sana all’s” linguistic meanings in communication context (Unpublished research paper).

Pontillas, M., et al. (2020). Sana all: Filipino teenagers’ indirectness of today’s time (Unpublished research study).

Ryan, R. M., &Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology.

Somera, G. B., & Azarias, R. A. (2024). Linguistic mapping of Bago language: The case of selected upland speech communities in Ilocos Sur, Philippines. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 13(14), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2024.24116

Taguchi, N. (2021). Pragmatics and language learning. Routledge.

Tannen, D. (2020). Conversational style. Oxford University Press.

Tupas, R., & Lorente, B. P. (2014). A new politics of language in the Philippines.

Valkenburg, P. M., et al. (2022). Social media use and adolescent well-being.

Van Ruler, B. et al. (2018). Communication theory framework.

Vicentino, L., et al. (2022). Sana all: Netizens’ perception of government responses to COVID-19.

Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 19(1), 52–90.

Yule, G. (2019). The study of language (7th ed.). Cambridge University Press.