Using Cross-Grade Learning in Improving Learners’ Literacy
Maria Heizel S. Agujar1, Dahlia R. Domingo2, Colleen Paula O. Azada3, Monica L. Dummy4, Crislyn T. Geralao5, and Fragimae Z. Nantiza6
1-6New Era University, Quezon City, Philippines
ISSN: 2961-3035 | Volume 5 | Issue 1 | May 2025
Abstract
Cross-grade learning is an educational approach where learners from different grade levels collaborate and learn together. This method fosters peer mentoring, enhances social skills, and provides diverse perspectives, enriching the learning experience for all learners involved. This study aimed to find out how cross-grade learning helps to improve learner's literacy as well as their performance and development. The researchers conducted a standardized test on the 31 learners to Grade 4 and 5 from Don Onofrey Academy, President Corazon Cory Aquino Elementary School, and Melencio Elementary School in Quezon City who participated via Google Meet to test their literacy level. The results of this study were analyzed by the help of SPSS tool using T-test for dependent samples at.05 level of significance. The final result shows that the application of cross grade learning improves the performance of selected grade 4 and grade 5 learners. The study concluded that the majority of learners had below-grade-level reading skills. Cross-grade learning improved literacy among selected Grade 4 and 5 learners, with significant improvements observed in Grade 5. The pre-test and post test results showed notable gains in reading, writing, and vocabulary skills. However, challenges such as inconsistent internet connections, late arrivals, confusion in breakout rooms, and learners' hesitance to communicate hindered the online application of cross-grade learning, making it viable but not ideal for online distance learning. Based on the study's findings, it is recommended that teachers create more engaging exercises to enhance learners' reading, writing, and vocabulary skills, and plan collaborative activities to foster positive relationships among them. Future researchers should extend the intervention duration for better evaluation, while school administrations may hold face-to-face sessions for comprehensive literacy assessment and encourage teachers to attend professional development activities.
DOI: N/A
References
Abdelhalim, S. M. (2017). Developing EFL students’ reading comprehension and reading engagement: effects of a proposed instructional strategy. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0701.05
Alenizi, A. M. K. (2019, June 1). Understanding of reading among teachers and learners: A descriptive study of Pre-University English language teaching /learning in Saudi Arabia. SSRN,?abstract_id=3418530&fbclid=IwAR2pQgk6TvSVUK92qdSgPvUmU8UXd3QLtazFWZZpR6x3vtpNTSDfZmh9i7U
Aslan, Y. (2016). The effect of cross-curricular instruction on reading comprehension. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(8), 1797–1801. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040808
Cross-grade student collaboration in service learning. (n.d.). Prizmah: Center for Jewish Day Schools. https://prizmah.org/hayidion/collaboration/cross-grade-studentcollaboration-service- learning?fbclid=IwAR1NgRxy_nv_RlLHkQYVYVjJNgTCLtWiB4Ceq5MZD3CQLrlcw0LQWUk7Ro0
Cornish, L. (2015). Are mixed-grade classes any better or worse for learning? TheConversation.https://theconversation.com/are-mixed-grade-classes-any-better-or-worse forlearning38856?fbclid=IwAR1j1Voka6Mq4JCnBTLEwljSOwrFVcvNmuyyrxX8G9_cTww7Qp91FP6_G8U
DeBruin-Parecki, A. (Editor); Kleeck, A. V. (Editor); and Gear, S. (Editor),(2015). Developing early comprehension: Laying the foundation for reading success. Communication Disorders & Special Education Faculty Books. 7, https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/cdse_books/7
Lucas, M.R. & Borabo, H.G. (2012). Child and adolescent development. 107 & 271
Mousavian, S., & Siahpoosh, H. (2018). The effects of vocabulary pre-teaching and prequestioning on intermediate iranian EFL learners’ reading comprehenstion ability. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(2), 58. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.2p.58
Muhammad, J., Eng, L., & Mohamed, A., (2015). Developing reading comprehension modules to facilitate reading comprehension among Malaysian secondary school ESL students. International Journal of Instruction, 8(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1085274
Paris, S., Calfee, R., Filby, N., Hiebert, E., Pearson, P. D., Valencia, S., & Wolf, K. (1992). A framework for authentic literacy assessment.The Reading Teacher, 46 (2), 88-98
Ramrathan, L. & Mzimela, J. (2016). Teaching reading in a multi-grade class: Teachers’ adaptive skills and teacher agency in teaching across grade R and grade 1. South African Journal of Childhood Education 6(2), a448. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v6i2.448
Shanahan, T. (2010). What about cross-grade or cross-class grouping?, https://www.shanahanonliteracy.com/blog/what-about-cross-grade-orcrossclassgrouping#sthash.DIKrC8Rz.cUapVdlw.dpbs
Silverman, R. D., Martin-Beltran, M., Peercy, M. M., Hartranft, A. M., McNeish, D. M., Artzi, L., & Nunn, S. (2017). Effects of a cross-age peer learning program on the vocabulary and comprehension of english learners and non-english learners in elementary school. The Elementary School Journal, 117(3), 485– 512. https://doi.org/10.1086/690210
Song, X. (2023). The English Learning Motivation of Chinese High School Students: Cross-grade Survey Analysis. International Journal of Education, Learning and Development, 11(10). https://eajournals.org/ijeld/vol11-issue10-2023/the-english-learning-motivation-of-chinese-high-school-students-cross-grade-survey-analysis/?form=MG0AV3
Zhang, Q.-M., & Kim, T.-Y. (2013). Cross-grade analysis of Chinese students’ English learning motivation: a mixed-methods study. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14(4), 615–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-013-9288-3
Tomas, D., (2023). Assessment of the implementation of mother tongue based-multilingual education in the province of Benguet. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1W6C6AgxXFud7I4nwfX4ujpKibAWBId0J/view